Research integrity requires more than policies

Part of the Building Better Research Ecosystems series

Universities, journals, funding agencies, and research organisations invest significant time and resources in developing policies intended to promote research integrity. These policies establish expectations, define responsibilities, create procedures for handling disputes, and provide mechanisms for addressing misconduct when it occurs. Yet despite increasingly sophisticated governance frameworks, research integrity concerns continue to emerge across disciplines, institutions, and countries.

Press enter or click to view image in full size

The deeper values, and behaviours that shape ethical research every day. Policies provide structure, but culture determines how they are applied.

This raises an important question: if policies exist, why do integrity problems still occur? The uncomfortable truth is that research integrity requires more than policies. It requires an ecosystem that actively supports ethical behaviour long before formal procedures become necessary. It also requires every participant in a collaboration to exercise due diligence in their decisions and actions, particularly those in leadership positions, whose responsibilities include fostering a culture of transparency, accountability, fairness, and respect for all contributors.

Integrity and compliance are not the same thing

Compliance focuses on whether rules have been followed, whilst integrity focuses on whether actions are consistent with ethical principles. The distinction matters. A researcher can comply with minimum procedural requirements while still acting in ways that undermine trust, fairness, transparency, or professional respect. Similarly, actions may technically fall within policy boundaries while creating outcomes that many would consider inconsistent with the spirit of responsible research conduct. This is why integrity cannot be reduced to checklists, forms, approvals, or regulations. Research is ultimately a human activity. Every project involves decisions, relationships, judgments, and responsibilities that extend beyond what can realistically be captured in written policies.

The limits of rule-based governance

No policy can anticipate every situation that may arise during a research collaboration. Such collaborations may often evolve in unexpected ways. Projects expand, personnel change, new opportunities may emerge, additional analyses may be conducted, and follow-on publications may be developed. Data may continue to be used long after the original funding period ends. International collaborations introduce additional complexity through differing institutional cultures, legal frameworks, expectations, and power structures.

In these situations, policy documents can provide guidance. However, they cannot replace professional judgment. The question often becomes not “What am I allowed to do?” but rather: “What is the right thing to do?” The answer to the second question frequently determines whether trust is strengthened or damaged.

Research integrity exists within an ecosystem

Integrity should not be viewed solely as an individual responsibility. It is shaped by the environment in which researchers operate. Every research ecosystem sends signals about what is valued, rewarded, tolerated, or ignored. Researchers and other stakeholders observe how institutions respond to concerns. These responses help shape perceptions of fairness, accountability, and whether research integrity is truly valued in practice. They observe whether transparency is encouraged or discouraged; whether contributions are genuinely recognised; and whether accountability applies equally to everyone regardless of seniority, status, funding, or institutional affiliation. Over time, these observations influence behaviour, shaping perceptions of what is acceptable, what will be overlooked, and where accountability is unlikely to be enforced.

An unhealthy ecosystem may unintentionally create incentives that prioritise outputs over relationships, publications over people, and institutional reputation over difficult but necessary conversations. Policies alone cannot compensate for a culture that fails to reinforce ethical behaviour.

Following the rules versus doing the right thing

Some of the most important integrity decisions occur in situations where no formal violation has taken place. Individuals entrusted with leadership responsibilities should be willing to ask whether all contributors have been treated fairly; whether expectations have been communicated clearly, whether transparency has been maintained throughout the project, whether concerns have been addressed openly and respectfully, and whether power imbalances influenced decision-making; and whether one would be comfortable explaining this decision publicly.

These questions extend beyond compliance. They relate to professional responsibility and reflect a commitment to the principles of collaboration. Responsible research conduct involves more than avoiding misconduct. It involves actively promoting fairness, respect, transparency, and accountability throughout the research process, while ensuring that both the conduct of the work and the treatment of those involved reflect the highest standards of professional and ethical practice.

Integrity is revealed when things become difficult

Strong professional conduct is often easy when circumstances are favourable. The true test occurs when challenges emerge, disagreements arise, projects encounter delays, funding ends, collaborators have different expectations, or questions are raised.

At these moments, policies provide a framework and character determines how that framework is applied. The most trusted researchers, institutions, and organisations are often distinguished not by the absence of problems, but by how they respond when problems occur. Transparency, honesty, responsiveness, respect, and accountability — these qualities build confidence in the integrity of both individuals and institutions.

The responsibility of research leaders

University leaders, funding organisations, journals, and senior researchers play a particularly important role in shaping research culture. Policies establish the standards, but leadership demonstrates the commitment to uphold them. Important questions that arise are whether ethical conduct is genuinely valued or simply discussed; whether concerns are welcomed or avoided; and whether integrity receives attention only during formal investigations or forms part of everyday decision-making.

Creating an ethical research ecosystem requires more than publishing policies on institutional websites. It requires consistent reinforcement through actions, incentives, leadership behaviour, and organisational culture. It requires individuals at every level of the system to model the behaviours they expect from others.

Building a culture worth protecting

Research depends on trust - between collaborators, institutions, researchers, participants, and society. This trust is fragile, and protecting it requires more than compliance systems.

It requires a collective commitment to ethical conduct at every stage of the research process. Policies provide structure and accountability but these are only one component of a much larger system.

Research integrity ultimately depends on the choices people make when policies provide guidance, but ethics demand more.

The strongest research environments are not necessarily those with the most policies, but those where doing the right thing remains the expectation even when no policy specifically requires it.

Written by Sasha Saugh
Aquatic Veterinarian | Founder, Aquaglobal Veterinary Consulting